Lookback period
In Arkansas, A.C.A. § 5-65-205 counts certain refusal convictions and refusal-based suspensions or revocations within a window immediately before the current offense as previous offenses that enhance the administrative penalty. In Michigan, MCL 257.625f lengthens the refusal sanction for a repeat refusal within a stated window. In Nebraska, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-498.02 looks to prior administrative license revocations with final orders within a stated period.
In Arkansas, Michigan and Nebraska, the statutes described here tie a heavier license consequence to earlier events within a stated window, which DUI.law calls the lookback period. Louisiana's refusal statute turns on prior separate refusals. This page describes the statutes of the named states.
What counts as a previous offense in Arkansas?
In Arkansas, A.C.A. § 5-65-205 directs the Office of Driver Services to treat certain events that occurred within a window immediately before the current offense as a previous offense for the purpose of enhancing the administrative penalty for refusing a chemical test.
Arkansas's A.C.A. § 5-65-205 lists two such events: a conviction for an offense of refusing to submit to a chemical test, and a suspension or revocation of driving privileges for an arrest for refusing a chemical test when the person was not subsequently acquitted of the criminal charge. The graduated suspensions and revocations in that statute apply to a person who refuses a chemical test of breath, saliva or urine.
How does Michigan treat a repeat refusal?
In Michigan, MCL 257.625f directs the secretary of state to suspend or deny a license, permit or nonresident operating privilege after a chemical-test refusal when the person does not request a hearing within the stated period after notice or does not prevail at the hearing, and the sanction is longer for a repeat refusal within a stated window.
For a person operating a commercial motor vehicle, Michigan's MCL 257.625f ties revocation of all vehicle group designations to a repeat refusal that occurred in a separate incident from, and within a separate stated window of, a prior refusal, lasting at least a stated period and until the person is approved for a vehicle group designation.
How does Nebraska look back at earlier revocations?
In Nebraska, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-498.02 directs the director, at the end of a stated period after arrest or after a hearing in which the director finds the license should be revoked, to revoke the operator's license of a person whose chemical test discloses a concentration of alcohol specified in a separate section of the statutes.
Nebraska's Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-498.02 makes that test-result revocation longer when the person's driving record abstract in the department's computerized records shows a prior administrative license revocation with a final order issued during a stated period immediately preceding the time the order of revocation is issued.
How does Louisiana treat earlier refusals?
In Louisiana, RS 14:98.7 provides that a person under arrest for an impaired-driving violation, including any law or ordinance that prohibits operating a vehicle while impaired, may not refuse a chemical test requested by a law enforcement officer if the person has refused such a test on a stated number of "previous and separate occasions" of any such violation. Louisiana's provision applies only when that condition about earlier separate refusals is met.
The figures for your state
Deadlines, limits and penalty ranges are set by each state’s statutes, so this page does not state them. Each state page shows them with the official source and the date they were verified — or says plainly that a figure has not been confirmed yet.
Common questions
Does an earlier refusal-based suspension count in Arkansas?
In Arkansas, A.C.A. § 5-65-205 counts a suspension or revocation of driving privileges for an arrest for refusing a chemical test as a previous offense if it occurred within the window immediately before the current offense and the person was not subsequently acquitted of the criminal charge. It counts for enhancing the administrative penalty under that statute.
Does Michigan use the same window for commercial and noncommercial refusals?
In Michigan, MCL 257.625f states one window for a repeat refusal by a person operating a vehicle other than a commercial motor vehicle, and a different window for a repeat refusal, in a separate incident, by a person operating a commercial motor vehicle.
Sources
- A.C.A. § 5-65-205 (official source, opens in a new tab)A.C.A. § 5-65-205 — Refusal to submit to a chemical test.
- MCL 257.625f (official source, opens in a new tab)MCL 257.625f - Effect of failure to request hearing; hearing procedure; notice; authority of
- Neb. Rev. Stat. § 60-498.02 (official source, opens in a new tab)Driving under influence of alcohol; revocation of operator's license; reinstatement; procedure; ignition interlock permit; restriction on operation of motor vehicle.
- RS 14:98.7 (official source, opens in a new tab)Unlawful refusal to submit to chemical tests; arrests for driving while impaired
These sources are cited for the jurisdiction and scope identified on this page. They do not establish the law of another state.
Related
Legal information, not legal advice. Reading this page does not create a lawyer–client relationship. See our editorial standards.